Charles Molony Condon , known as Charlie Condon (born 1953), was a former Ninth Circuit Adviser from 1980 to 1991), when he was elected at the age of 27 he became the youngest lawyer in South Carolina's history, former attorney general of the US state, South Carolina. He is the first chairman of the Association of General Lawyers of the Republic. In 2008, he was president of John McCain's presidential campaign in South Carolina. He is currently a lawyer in private practice at Mt. Fun outside of her hometown, Charleston, South Carolina.
Video Charlie Condon
Kantor publik
Condon was the first elected attorney general in 1994. In re-election in 1998, he defeated 54-46 percent, Democratic lawyer Tom Turnipseed from the Columbia capital, former Alabama colleague George C. Wallace who later became a liberal politician activist.
Maps Charlie Condon
Education
Universitas Notre Dame di South Bend, Indiana, Bachelor of Arts, 1975, magna cum laude
Duke University Law School, Juris Doctor, 1978
Domestic/Domestic/Domestic Laws
While the attorney general, Condon directed all prosecutors to follow the policy of no problems in cases related to domestic violence, even if the victims are reluctant to file a lawsuit. (He also succeeded in pushing) the victim rights bill... (which), will demand that victims of crime be treated "with justice, respect and dignity." Prosecutors should notify victims of crimes about changes in their case and grant them access to case records after the investigation closes. The judge will ensure his mandate is followed.
First Chief of Attorney General Association of Republicans
Condon announced as chairman of the first association, that its members would act as policy organizations to promote Republican ideas about limited government, fighting crime, and individual responsibility.
Asked about new activism by many public lawyers, Mr. Condon, despite warning that he can not speak for all Republicans in the post, said the line between the legislature and the chief executive of state law should be withdrawn carefully. Pointing to a national battle over teen-aged smoking as an example, he said, 'I think everyone has a role, and in terms of government is limited the notion of what should and should not be done through the legislature, not through the judicial branch. raises some serious questions. '"http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00912F73A5F0C718EDDAF0894D1494D81&scp=19&sq=charlie condon & amp; st = cse https://web.archive.org/web/20110126063535/http://www.rslc.com/raga/
Attack house and invite bullet
In 2001, Attorney General Condon announced an open season for home invaders. He mandated that, "citizens who defend their homes against invasions should not be arrested, prosecuted or prosecuted." "The message needs to be sent out loud and clear that the state will support homeowners if their home is attacked," he said in an interview. "I place the invaders with the notice that if a resident chooses to use lethal force, there will be no prosecution." But Mr. Condon said he was tired of seeing homeowners defending their homes dragged through long investigations and trials before being cleared out. , when it was clear to him that they had done nothing wrong.
"You do not want to put the homeowner in a position to say, 'If I use lethal force, I might be released after the trial,'" Condon said. "It's tantamount to saying that people have rights, but there's a big cross attached to it.Most courts have laissez-faire attitudes about these things, with the consideration that everything will be okay after the trial but I think we need to send the message that the house is a holy land, a point. "
Arguing before the US Supreme Court: Reno v. Condon
While serving as Attorney General for South Carolina, Condon argues as a respondent in the case of Reno v. Condon . Congress enacted the 1994 Driver's Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), which sets up a regulatory scheme that limits the State's ability to disclose personal information of the driver without the driver's consent, having found that many States are selling the information. DPPA is contrary to South Carolina law, where information contained in a State DMV record is available to any person or entity filling out the applicant's name and address form and stating that the information will not be used for telephone calls. South Carolina Attorney General filed a lawsuit, accusing DPPA of violating the Tenth and Eleventh Amendments. After success at the District Court and the Court of Appeal, the lawsuit ended in front of the Supreme Court. Condon succeeded in the Court of Appeals which ruled that Congress stepped illegally into the territory of the country and noted further that there is no constitutional right to privacy in the information contained in the public record. South Carolina Attorney General Charlie Condon, upon hearing that the Supreme Court agreement to hear the case, said he believes citizens have the right to keep their privacy protected - which he says is guaranteed by a clause in the South Carolina Constitution. But the real question is who should enforce that protection, Condon said. Condon and other state officials strongly believe that the state should have full autonomy when it comes to managing public records. In the case before the Supreme Court, South Carolina will argue that the new federal law violates the 10th Amendment.
"The people of Carolina make driver records, take care of him, and have the right to determine their use," he said in a statement. "South Carolina has to be run by Southern Carolinians.If the federal government can tell us what to do with these records, it can tell us that we can not keep records at all.The 10th amendment is the legal and spiritual guardian of the right- Washington, DC, is far from South Carolina, and the federal government must keep its distance. "
Condon's appearance was accepted by the Court as political, and his position garnered a series of lively and entertaining questions from the more liberal members of the Court.
Landmark Cases
Whitner vs. State of South Carolina, 328 S.C.1, 492 S.E. 2d 771 (1997)
Country ex rail Condon vs. Hodges, 349 S.C. 232, 562 S.E. 2d 623 (2002)
Current activity
Condon is a private practice lawyer at Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. He specializes in the field of Criminal Defense; Criminal Law; White Collar Crime; Drug Crime; Adult Criminal Law; Personal injury; Workers' Compensation; Accidents and Car Injuries; False Death; Government relations; Government; Court process; Administrative law; Guardianship and Conservatory; Workers' Compensation; Professional License.
References
External links
- Law Firm Charlie Condon, LLC
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments